Recent Developments in the Paragard IUD Class Action. A new case has been added to the Paragard multidistrict litigation (MDL) from California, involving a woman who experienced a fractured IUD that required corrective surgery. As of July 2024, the Paragard MDL includes 2,822 cases, with a bellwether trial scheduled for October.

Plaintiffs claim that the Paragard IUD is susceptible to breakage because of its rigid design. Ongoing disputes over document disclosures and prior FDA warnings regarding potential device fractures continue to complicate the litigation. Individuals affected by Paragard-related injuries are encouraged to seek both medical care and legal guidance as the case moves forward.

December 2025: Paragard Intrauterine Device (IUD) Class Action Lawsuit Litigation Updates and Recent News

November 4, 2025

MDL Expands by 63 Cases
The Paragard multidistrict litigation (MDL) grew by 63 new filings in October, bringing the total number of pending lawsuits to 3,658.

September 14, 2025

• Case Count Reaches 3,569 Over the past month, 40 new cases were added to the MDL. Among them is a California plaintiff claiming her Paragard IUD fractured during removal in 2025, requiring multiple surgical procedures.

September 8, 2025

• Key Depositions Set Several depositions have been scheduled in preparation for upcoming bellwether trials.

August 18, 2025

• Plaintiffs Dispute Broad Document Requests Plaintiffs objected to defendants’ requests for 23 categories of materials related to expert Dr. David Kessler, arguing that these demands were excessive, duplicative, and beyond federal rules.

August 13, 2025

• New Non-Hormonal IUD Introduced Miudella, a copper-based alternative to Paragard, has entered the market. Early feedback suggests fewer complications, though long-term safety data is not yet available.

August 12, 2025

• Court Issues Expert Testimony Rules A new case management order limits depositions to seven hours, sets disclosure timelines, protects attorney–expert communications, and requires plaintiffs’ experts to be deposed first.

August 1, 2025

• MDL Case Count at 3,529 The Paragard litigation continues to grow, focusing primarily on claims involving IUD breakage during removal and resulting injuries.

July 14, 2025

• Seventh Amended Scheduling Order Issued Judge May updated key pretrial deadlines for the first three bellwether trials, including expert disclosures, expert discovery closure, and Daubert/dispositive motion deadlines. The first bellwether trial is set for January 20, 2026.

June 26, 2025

• Discovery Win for Plaintiffs Judge May allowed plaintiffs to reopen the deposition of corporate witness William Senatore, rejecting attempts by CooperSurgical and others to block questions about a 2023 internal audit.

• June 18, 2025 – New Lawsuit Filed in Delaware A Delaware woman filed a new MDL case against Teva Pharmaceuticals and The Cooper Companies, alleging her IUD broke during removal in 2021, requiring hysteroscopy and causing heavy menstrual bleeding.

June 10, 2025

• Key Corporate Deposition Reopened The court confirmed plaintiffs could question William Senatore regarding the 2023 IPS audit, rejecting the defense’s privilege claims.

June 6, 2025

• Bellwether Trial Path Confirmed Judge May issued a Fifth Amended Scheduling Order, setting deadlines for expert reports, discovery closure, and Daubert/dispositive motions. The first bellwether trial is scheduled for January 20, 2026.

May 14, 2025

• Significant Increase in Filings April saw 216 new lawsuits added, bringing the MDL total to 3,252—the largest monthly increase in over two years.

May 12, 2025

• First Bellwether Case Details The Braxton case involves a plaintiff whose Paragard IUD fractured during removal in 2019, requiring a second surgery. The lawsuit alleges permanent reproductive injury and disfigurement.

May 9, 2025

• First Bellwether Trial Scheduled The Braxton v. Teva case was selected for the initial bellwether trial. The defense viewed it as strategically strong for testing liability and damages arguments.

April 28, 2025

• Fact Discovery Nears Completion The MDL is finishing the fact-gathering phase, with focus on final depositions.

April 1, 2025

• MDL Filings Surge March added 71 new cases, bringing the total to 3,036. Attorneys are likely filing ahead of anticipated settlement deadlines.

March 26, 2025

• Court Upholds Dismissal of Non-Compliant Cases Six cases were dismissed with prejudice for failing to comply with Case Management Orders. The court emphasized strict adherence to procedural rules in large MDLs.

March 14, 2025

• 30(b)(6) Depositions Approved Plaintiffs may proceed with corporate representative depositions, though the court will review objections on scope.

March 3, 2025

• MDL Continues to Grow Twenty-eight new cases brought the MDL total to 2,965.

February 19, 2025

• Bellwether Trial Dates Announced The first bellwether trial is set for January 12, 2026, with two subsequent trials in March and May 2026.

February 19, 2025

• Multiple Lawsuits Dismissed Several cases were dismissed due to statutes of limitations, even for plaintiffs with late-emerging injuries.

February 6, 2025

• MDL Adds 55 Cases The January case count reached 2,937, likely influenced by settlement speculation.

February 1, 2025

• New California Lawsuit Filed A plaintiff alleges her Paragard IUD broke during removal, causing injury and loss of reproductive health.

January 21, 2025

• Warning Labels Deemed Inadequate Critics argue current Paragard warnings fail to properly convey the risks of breakage and associated complications.

January 14, 2025

• Teva Pursues Case Dismissals Teva Pharmaceuticals seeks to dismiss claims citing documentation deficiencies, aiming to reduce potential plaintiffs.

January 13, 2025

• Settlement Mediator Appointed A retired judge has been designated to oversee settlement negotiations in hopes of resolving most cases prior to trials.

January 3, 2025

• Modest MDL Growth December added 20 new cases, bringing the MDL total to 2,882.

December 11, 2024

• Court Grants Extension on Contention Interrogatories Defendants received extra time to respond to interrogatories; plaintiffs argued for timely responses.

December 3, 2024

• MDL Adds 38 Cases November filings increased the MDL total to 2,862, showing steady growth.

November 26, 2024

• California Lawsuit Filed A California woman alleged her Paragard IUD broke during removal, causing injuries and emotional distress.

November 4, 2024

• First Bellwether Trial Scheduled The court set the initial bellwether trial for December 1, 2025, with a second trial tentatively on February 2, 2026.

November 1, 2024

• MDL Case Count Rebounds October filings added 77 new cases, bringing the MDL total to 2,824.

October 24, 2024

• Custodial File Production Deadline Set Defendants must complete rolling production of custodial files by December 11, 2024.

October 23, 2024

• FDA Reviewing IUD LabelThe FDA is reviewing Paragard labeling after multiple reports of device breakage.

October 22, 2024

• Motion to Add Teva International Denied The court rejected plaintiffs’ attempt to include Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. as a defendant due to filing delays.

October 21, 2024

• Women Share Experiences Women are coming forward to report complications associated with the Paragard IUD, emphasizing potential risks and the importance of informed decision-making in birth control choices.

October 18, 2024

• Label Updated with Breakage Warning The FDA mandated a warning highlighting the risk of IUD breakage and potential surgical intervention.

October 8, 2024

• MDL Sees New Case Filings Twelve new cases were filed in early October, including a Texas plaintiff whose IUD broke during removal.

October 1, 2024

• First Decline in MDL Cases in Years September saw a reduction of 49 cases, dropping the total to 2,747, as some plaintiffs filed in state courts instead.

September 24, 2024

• Motion to Dismiss Schedule Set Court established deadlines for responses to Teva and Cooper’s motion to dismiss based on statute of limitations.

September 16, 2024

• Teva and Cooper Seek Dismissal of 236 Claims Defendants requested dismissal of allegedly untimely cases, citing statutes of limitations and repose.

September 10, 2024

• New Missouri Lawsuit Filed A Missouri woman alleges her Paragard IUD broke during removal, causing pain and additional surgeries.

September 5, 2024

• MDL Caseload Increases August filings added 57 new cases, bringing total MDL claims to 2,793.

September 2, 2024

• Plaintiffs Target Teva Plaintiffs attempt to add Teva International as a defendant; Teva contests the procedural amendment.

August 26, 2024

• Motion to Compel Custodial Files Plaintiffs request the court order production of files for 31 newly identified custodians.

August 19, 2024

• Settlement Speculation Rises With trial set for October, potential settlement amounts are discussed based on injury severity.

August 13, 2024

• Defendants Seek Dismissal Based on Statutes Teva and others file motions citing statute of limitations and repose, potentially affecting older claims.

August 9, 2024

• New MDL Lawsuit Filed A plaintiff alleges her IUD fractured during removal, causing pain and further treatment.

August 5, 2024

• MDL Case Count Drops Slightly Active cases decreased from 2,774 to 2,736 but remain among the largest MDLs.

July 10, 2024

• California Woman Joins MDL A Southern California plaintiff joins the MDL after her IUD fractured in July 2022, requiring a second surgery.

July 9, 2024

• Status Conference Scheduled Next MDL status conference set for July 31; Daubert motions due July 23.

July 1, 2024

• MDL Total at 2,822 June filings bring total MDL cases to 2,822. The first bellwether trial is set for October 2024.

June 3, 2024

• MDL Reaches 2,690 Cases Steady growth continues, with the first bellwether trial planned for later this year.

May 6, 2024

• Dispute Over Document Review Plaintiffs challenge defendants’ modifications to Technology Assisted Review (TAR) systems in document production.

April 3, 2024

• FDA Warning Ignored: An investigative report alleges that despite an FDA warning about Paragard potentially breaking during removal, CooperSurgical did not take steps to address the issue.

Click Here for a FREE Claim Review from a Paragard IUD Class Action Lawyer

Can Paragard IUDs (Intrauterine Device) Lead to Serious Health Issues?

The Paragard IUD, a widely used copper intrauterine device, has become the subject of increasing litigation as thousands of women report serious complications and allege insufficient warnings from its manufacturer, Teva Pharmaceuticals.
While Paragard is often praised for its effectiveness at preventing pregnancy and its hormone-free design, many women have experienced severe adverse effects. Reported issues include device expulsion, migration, uterine perforation, and other significant health problems.

What Happens When a Paragard IUD Moves or Breaks?

A major concern is device expulsion, where the IUD partially or completely exits the uterus. This can result in unintended pregnancy and may require medical procedures to remove or replace the device. In more severe cases, the IUD can migrate outside the uterus, embedding in the uterine wall, intestines, or other organs. This can lead to intense pain, infections, organ damage, and may require surgery to locate and remove the device.

Can a Paragard IUD Cause Uterine Perforation?

The Paragard IUD, a popular copper intrauterine device, is facing a wave of litigation as thousands of women come forward alleging serious complications and inadequate warnings from the manufacturer, Teva Pharmaceuticals.

While Paragard has been praised for its effectiveness in preventing pregnancy and its appeal to those seeking hormone-free contraception, a growing number of women are reporting devastating complications. These range from device expulsion and migration to uterine perforation, along with a host of other debilitating side effects.

What Happens When a Paragard IUD Migrates or Breaks?

One of the most concerning complications associated with Paragard is device expulsion, where the IUD is partially or completely expelled from the uterus. This can lead to unintended pregnancy and may require medical intervention to remove or replace the device. In some cases, the IUD can migrate outside the uterus, embedding itself in the uterine wall, intestines, or other organs. This can cause severe pain, infection, organ damage, and may necessitate surgery to locate and remove the device.

Can a Paragard IUD Perforate the Uterus?

Although uncommon, uterine perforation is a serious risk associated with Paragard insertion. This happens when the IUD pierces the uterine wall, which can result in intense pain, internal bleeding, infection, and harm to nearby organs. In severe cases, emergency surgery may be necessary to repair the damage and remove the device.

Click Here for a FREE Claim Review from a Paragard IUD Class Action Lawyer

What Are the Typical Side Effects of Paragard?

Besides risks like expulsion and uterine perforation, individuals using Paragard have reported several other side effects, such as:

• Heavier menstrual periods and intensified cramps
• Pelvic discomfort and inflammation
• Copper-related issues, potentially causing headaches, nausea, or vomiting
• Allergic reactions to the device
• Rare cases of ectopic pregnancy, a serious condition where a fertilized egg implants outside the uterus

Is Teva Pharmaceuticals Responsible for Paragard Injuries?

Lawsuits in the Paragard Class Action contend that Teva Pharmaceuticals may be liable for negligence, defective design, and inadequate warnings. Plaintiffs claim that the company did not properly alert users to the risks linked to Paragard and minimized the possibility of serious complications in its promotional materials.

The Paragard Class Action lawsuits against Teva Pharmaceuticals accuse the company of negligence, failure to warn, and manufacturing defects. Plaintiffs allege that Teva failed to adequately inform users about the risks associated with Paragard and downplayed the potential for serious side effects in its marketing materials.

Many women claim they were not made aware of the possibility of device expulsion, migration, or perforation, and that had they known the true risks, they would not have chosen Paragard. Some plaintiffs also allege that the IUD’s design or materials are faulty, contributing to their injuries.

Click Here for a FREE Claim Review from a Paragard IUD Class Action Lawyer

What Legal Steps Can You Take After Experiencing Paragard Complications?

As of June 2024, more than 2,690 Paragard Class Action lawsuits have been filed against Teva Pharmaceuticals in federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) in Georgia, with additional cases pending in state courts nationwide. While a comprehensive settlement has not yet been reached, these ongoing lawsuits could have major implications for both the manufacturer and the women affected by Paragard.

If you’ve experienced complications from a Paragard IUD, it is critical to seek medical care and speak with an attorney experienced in Paragard Class Action litigation. You may be eligible to pursue compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost income, and other related damages.

The rise in Paragard lawsuits highlights the importance of medical device safety and the obligation of manufacturers to fully disclose potential risks to patients. As the litigation evolves, staying informed and having access to legal guidance can help ensure your rights are protected.

If you or a loved one have been harmed by Paragard, reach out for legal support—you are not alone.

Click HERE to fill out the form on this page to find out if you qualify for a claim.

Mass torts vs. class actions at a glance

When we’re talking about mass tort and class action lawsuits, we’re discussing two distinct legal approaches used to handle claims where many individuals are harmed by the same entity or event.

Mass tort lawsuits allow multiple individuals to pursue claims where each person’s circumstances are unique. Imagine a neighborhood hit by a storm where every house suffers different damage. In a mass tort, each homeowner files their own lawsuit, but the court coordinates the cases for efficiency. This ensures that each individual maintains control over their own case and can seek compensation that reflects their personal situation.

By comparison, class action lawsuits and class action settlements combine many people into a single lawsuit. Picture the whole neighborhood suing together, with a few representatives speaking for everyone. Individual control is limited because the lead plaintiff and their legal team make decisions affecting the entire group. Compensation is typically distributed evenly or according to a set formula that applies to all members.

Deciding What’s Right for You

Here’s a quick breakdown to help you weigh your options:

• Control: Mass torts give you more say in how your case is handled, whereas class actions offer less personal input.
• Compensation: With mass torts, settlements reflect individual circumstances; class actions typically provide the same outcome for everyone.
• Suitability: Mass torts are ideal when damages vary from person to person, while class actions work best when the harm is similar across all members.
• Efficiency: Class actions often resolve faster and require fewer resources because multiple claims are combined into a single case.

If you’ve been affected as part of a larger group, here’s what to think about before taking legal action. Do you want to have a hands-on role in managing your case, or are you comfortable letting a representative handle it? Are your losses unique and needing individual focus, or are they largely the same as others in the group? Your answers can guide you in choosing whether a mass tort or a class action makes the most sense for your situation.

Click Here for a FREE Claim Review from a Paragard IUD Class Action Lawyer